OUSA vs QQQ
O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OUSA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $754M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.61% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.85% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.65% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.97% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OUSA vs QQQ Performance
O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OUSA returned +13.85% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, OUSA is up 8.61% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, OUSA compounded at +13.65% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.97% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.2% for OUSA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for OUSA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OUSA charges 0.48% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $18 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OUSA currently yields 1.47% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OUSA and QQQ share 25 holdings out of 178 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OUSA or QQQ?
OUSA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OUSA or QQQ?
Over the past year OUSA returned +13.85% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), OUSA annualized +9.43% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OUSA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.2% for OUSA. Worst drawdown: OUSA -33.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OUSA and QQQ?
OUSA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OUSA and QQQ?
OUSA and QQQ share 25 common holdings with a 24.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 178 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OUSA or QQQ?
OUSA yields 1.47% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so OUSA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.