OUSA vs VOO

OUSA vs VOO

Which is better, OUSA or VOO?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOUSAVOO
Expense Ratio0.48%0.03%Best
AUM$743M$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.35%1.04%
Holdings101509
YTD Return+5.74%+11.55%Best
1Y Return+8.94%+17.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.81%+20.71%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.60%+12.80%Best
Volatility (annualized)13.2%Best15.2%
Max Drawdown-33.4%Best-34.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$15,106$18,262Best
Top 10 Weight44.9%36.4%Best
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 14, 2015Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2015 to Sep 10, 2026 (11.2 years).

OUSA vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.

OUSA vs VOO Performance

O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OUSA returned +8.94% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, OUSA is up 5.74% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Over three years, OUSA compounded at +12.81% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.60% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.96% annualized vs +9.10%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.2% for OUSA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for OUSA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OUSA charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OUSA currently yields 1.35% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

OUSA already in VOO97.1%
VOO already in OUSA39.6%

97.1% of OUSA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.6% of VOO's money is in holdings OUSA also owns.

Most of OUSA is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, OUSA as of Aug 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

98 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in OUSA and 505 in VOO, against full books of 101 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 398 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for OUSA (59.9% of the fund), and 2 for OUSA that do not appear in VOO (2.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OUSAWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc5.33%6.59%1.26%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 374.77%4.30%0.47%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0015.08%3.25%1.83%
JNJJohnson & Johnson5.70%0.95%4.75%
VVisa Inc5.14%0.87%4.27%
MAMastercard Inc4.71%0.64%4.07%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares3.91%0.72%3.19%
HDHome Depot Inc/The3.65%0.54%3.11%
MRKMerck & Co. Inc.3.51%0.49%3.02%
MCDMcdonald'S Corp3.08%0.30%2.78%

97.1% of OUSA is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

OUSAVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OUSA or VOO?

OUSA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, OUSA or VOO?

Over the past year OUSA returned +8.94% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), OUSA annualized +9.10% vs +12.96% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, OUSA or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.2% for OUSA. Worst drawdown: OUSA -33.4% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both OUSA and VOO?

OUSA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between OUSA and VOO?

97.1% of OUSA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.6% of VOO's is in holdings OUSA also owns. They hold 98 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in OUSA and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, OUSA or VOO?

OUSA yields 1.35% while VOO yields 1.04%, so OUSA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than OUSA?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.