OUSA vs VTI
O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OUSA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $754M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.81% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.94% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.74% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.07% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
OUSA vs VTI Performance
O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OUSA returned +14.94% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, OUSA is up 8.81% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, OUSA compounded at +13.74% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.07% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, OUSA has the edge at +9.45% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.2% for OUSA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for OUSA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OUSA charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OUSA currently yields 1.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OUSA and VTI share 98 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OUSA or VTI?
OUSA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OUSA or VTI?
Over the past year OUSA returned +14.94% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), OUSA annualized +9.45% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OUSA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.2% for OUSA. Worst drawdown: OUSA -33.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OUSA and VTI?
OUSA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OUSA and VTI?
OUSA and VTI share 98 common holdings with a 31.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OUSA or VTI?
OUSA yields 1.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OUSA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.