OUSA vs SCHD
O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, OUSA or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OUSA | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $743M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.35% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 101 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +5.88% | +23.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.61% | +27.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.19% | +15.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.06% | +10.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Tie | -33.4%Tie |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,429 | $16,223Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.9% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2015 to Sep 18, 2026 (11.2 years).
OUSA vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
OUSA vs SCHD Performance
O Shares US Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year OUSA returned +8.61% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, OUSA is up 5.88% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.
Over three years, OUSA compounded at +13.19% per year against +15.41% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.06% and +10.16% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +10.73% annualized vs +9.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 13.2% for OUSA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for OUSA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OUSA charges 0.48% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $6 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OUSA currently yields 1.35% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
28.6% of OUSA's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 67.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings OUSA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in OUSA and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 101 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 100 and 100 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 73 positions OUSA does not, 32.1% of the fund.
Largest: CVX 4.02%, COP 3.94%, BX 2.59%, SLB 2.19%, EOG 1.88%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OUSA | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 3.51% | 4.77% | 1.26% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 3.65% | 3.88% | 0.23% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 2.36% | 4.69% | 2.33% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.46% | 4.17% | 2.71% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 2.71% | 2.84% | 0.13% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.66% | 3.83% | 2.17% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.75% | 4.70% | 3.95% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.26% | 3.13% | 0.87% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 1.11% | 3.97% | 2.86% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.53% | 3.82% | 3.29% |
67.9% of SCHD is already inside OUSA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OUSA or SCHD?
OUSA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OUSA or SCHD?
Over the past year OUSA returned +8.61% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), OUSA annualized +9.09% vs +10.73% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OUSA or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 13.2% for OUSA. Worst drawdown: OUSA -33.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both OUSA and SCHD?
OUSA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OUSA and SCHD?
67.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings OUSA also owns. 67.9% of SCHD's is in holdings OUSA also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in OUSA and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, OUSA or SCHD?
OUSA yields 1.35% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than OUSA?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.