PRMR vs VYM

PRMR vs VYM

Which is better, PRMR or VYM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. PRMR is less concentrated, with 24.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: PRMR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPRMRVYM
Expense Ratio1.00%0.04%Best
AUM$91M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings340613
YTD Return+14.82%Best+12.29%
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.42%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.12%
Top 10 Weight24.3%Best26.1%
Fund FamilyPeakShares LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 8, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PRMR vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PRMR vs VYM Performance

PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) is an ETF from PeakShares LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PRMR is up 14.82% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PRMR charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRMR currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

PRMR already in VYM40.9%
VYM already in PRMR30.6%

40.9% of PRMR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.6% of VYM's money is in holdings PRMR also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

21 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in PRMR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 340 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 507 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PRMR (66.4% of the fund), and 31 for PRMR that do not appear in VYM (58.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PRMRWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.88%7.35%5.47%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.11%3.82%1.71%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.2.32%2.63%0.31%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.12%2.51%0.39%
CVXChevron Corp2.44%1.48%0.96%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.79%1.86%0.07%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.1.64%1.50%0.14%
HDHome Depot Inc/The1.77%1.34%0.43%
GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The1.93%1.13%0.80%
VZVerizon Communic2.24%0.80%1.44%

40.9% of PRMR is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PRMRVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PRMR or VYM?

PRMR has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PRMR and VYM?

40.9% of PRMR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.6% of VYM's is in holdings PRMR also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in PRMR and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, PRMR or VYM?

PRMR yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PRMR?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. PRMR is less concentrated, with 24.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.