PRMR vs VOO

PRMR vs VOO

Which is better, PRMR or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. PRMR is less concentrated, with 24.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: PRMR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPRMRVOO
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%Best
AUM$91M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings340509
YTD Return+14.82%Best+12.25%
1Y Return-+17.03%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Top 10 Weight24.3%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyPeakShares LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 8, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PRMR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PRMR vs VOO Performance

PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) is an ETF from PeakShares LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PRMR is up 14.82% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PRMR charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRMR currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PRMR already in VOO98.7%
VOO already in PRMR54.1%

98.7% of PRMR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 54.1% of VOO's money is in holdings PRMR also owns.

Most of PRMR is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

51 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in PRMR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 340 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 436 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PRMR (45.1% of the fund), and 1 for PRMR that do not appear in VOO (0.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PRMRWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp2.16%7.55%5.39%
AAPLApple, Inc2.15%7.05%4.90%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.52%5.36%2.84%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.04%4.13%2.09%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.88%2.86%0.98%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.81%2.62%0.81%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.03%1.90%0.13%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.11%1.46%0.65%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.96%1.46%0.50%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.2.32%1.00%1.32%

98.7% of PRMR is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PRMRVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PRMR or VOO?

PRMR has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PRMR and VOO?

98.7% of PRMR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 54.1% of VOO's is in holdings PRMR also owns. They hold 51 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in PRMR and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PRMR or VOO?

PRMR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PRMR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. PRMR is less concentrated, with 24.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.