PRXV vs VTI

PRXV vs VTI

Which is better, PRXV or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. PRXV led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. PRXV is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: PRXV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPRXVVTI
Expense Ratio0.36%0.03%Best
AUM$90M$690.1B
Dividend Yield1.48%1.03%
Holdings2773,524
YTD Return+13.76%Best+12.51%
1Y Return+16.59%Best+15.23%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.31%
Volatility (annualized)9.6%Best11.8%
Max Drawdown-6.7%Best-8.9%
$10,000 over 1.5 years$14,351$15,748Best
Top 10 Weight22.3%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyPraxis Mutual FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 7, 2025May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.5 years).

PRXV vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.

PRXV vs VTI Performance

Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) is an ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRXV returned +16.59% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, PRXV is up 13.76% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 9.6% for PRXV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.7% for PRXV and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PRXV charges 0.36% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXV currently yields 1.48% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

PRXV already in VTI97.8%
VTI already in PRXV67.6%

97.8% of PRXV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 67.6% of VTI's money is in holdings PRXV also owns.

Most of PRXV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

271 positions in common, counted across the 275 positions we hold weights for in PRXV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 277 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 883 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PRXV (30.1% of the fund), and 4 for PRXV that do not appear in VTI (1.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PRXVWeight in VTIDifference
AAPLApple, Inc0.31%6.29%5.98%
NVDANvidia Corp0.08%6.40%6.32%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp0.60%4.79%4.19%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.95%1.29%2.66%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.70%1.31%2.39%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc0.07%3.65%3.58%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.77%0.86%1.91%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A0.09%2.90%2.81%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.09%2.56%2.47%
WMTWalmart, Inc.1.92%0.68%1.24%

97.8% of PRXV is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PRXVVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PRXV or VTI?

PRXV has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PRXV or VTI?

Over the past year PRXV returned +16.59% vs +15.23% for VTI, so PRXV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PRXV annualized +27.23% vs +35.36% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PRXV or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 9.6% for PRXV. Worst drawdown: PRXV -6.7% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both PRXV and VTI?

PRXV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between PRXV and VTI?

97.8% of PRXV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 67.6% of VTI's is in holdings PRXV also owns. They hold 271 positions in common, counted across the 275 positions we hold weights for in PRXV and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, PRXV or VTI?

PRXV yields 1.48% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PRXV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PRXV?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. PRXV led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. PRXV is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.