PRXV vs VYM
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PRXV or VYM?
PRXV has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PRXV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. PRXV is less concentrated, with 22.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRXV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $91M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 278 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +16.91%Best | +12.87% |
| 1Y Return | +21.35%Best | +17.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8%Tie | 8.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -6.7%Tie | -6.7%Tie |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $14,535Best | $14,372 |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.2%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Praxis Mutual Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2025 to Sep 15, 2026 (1.4 years).
PRXV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
PRXV vs VYM Performance
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) is an ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRXV returned +21.35% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, PRXV is up 16.91% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRXV and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 8.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.7% for PRXV and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRXV charges 0.36% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $4 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXV currently yields 1.48% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
68.0% of PRXV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 67.9% of VYM's money is in holdings PRXV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
152 positions in common, counted across the 275 positions we hold weights for in PRXV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 278 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 378 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PRXV (29.4% of the fund), and 120 for PRXV that do not appear in VYM (31.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRXV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.70% | 3.82% | 0.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.09% | 7.35% | 7.26% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.67% | 2.51% | 0.16% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.85% | 1.80% | 0.05% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.64% | 1.86% | 0.22% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.56% | 1.66% | 0.10% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.71% | 1.37% | 0.34% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.60% | 1.38% | 0.22% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.38% | 1.34% | 0.04% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.40% | 1.31% | 0.09% |
68.0% of PRXV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRXV or VYM?
PRXV has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PRXV or VYM?
Over the past year PRXV returned +21.35% vs +17.25% for VYM, so PRXV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PRXV annualized +30.62% vs +29.57% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PRXV or VYM?
PRXV and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 8.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: PRXV -6.7% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both PRXV and VYM?
PRXV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PRXV and VYM?
68.0% of PRXV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 67.9% of VYM's is in holdings PRXV also owns. They hold 152 positions in common, counted across the 275 positions we hold weights for in PRXV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRXV or VYM?
PRXV yields 1.48% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PRXV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PRXV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. PRXV is less concentrated, with 22.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.