QFF vs QQQ

QFF vs QQQ

Which is better, QFF or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQFFQQQ
Expense Ratio0.50%0.18%Best
AUM$57M$486.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings26107
YTD Return-0.23%+17.54%Best
1Y Return-+25.59%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.18%
Top 10 Weight59.1%46.5%Best
Fund FamilyQualivian Investment Partners LPInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 13, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QFF vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QFF vs QQQ Performance

Qualivian Focus Fund ETF (QFF) is an ETF from Qualivian Investment Partners LP and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, QFF is down 0.23% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QFF charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFF currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

QFF already in QQQ48.8%
QQQ already in QFF36.5%

48.8% of QFF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 36.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings QFF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in QFF and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 26 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 86 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for QFF (61.1% of the fund), and 14 for QFF that do not appear in QQQ (46.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QFFWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.8.82%8.44%0.38%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A8.34%3.36%4.98%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.64%5.76%0.12%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.78%4.67%1.11%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.96%4.43%0.53%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.91%3.16%0.75%
METAMeta Platform Inc 3.06%2.78%0.28%
ORLYO'Eilly Automotive, Inc.4.15%0.34%3.81%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity2.47%1.69%0.78%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.65%1.86%0.21%

48.8% of QFF is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QFFQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QFF or QQQ?

QFF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QFF and QQQ?

48.8% of QFF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 36.5% of QQQ's is in holdings QFF also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in QFF and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, QFF or QQQ?

QFF yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than QFF?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.