QQA vs VTI
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQA or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQA led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $850M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.92% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 122 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.16%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +19.47%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,519Best | $14,046 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 17, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.2 years).
QQA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
QQA vs VTI Performance
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQA returned +19.47% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, QQA is up 14.16% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for QQA and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQA charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQA currently yields 9.92% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
72.0% of QQA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.1% of VTI's money is in holdings QQA also owns.
Most of QQA is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
92 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in QQA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 122 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,058 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QQA (50.3% of the fund), and 7 for QQA that do not appear in VTI (19.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.62% | 6.40% | 0.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.77% | 6.29% | 0.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.68% | 4.79% | 0.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.46% | 3.65% | 0.19% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.45% | 2.90% | 0.45% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.70% | 1.29% | 2.41% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.18% | 2.56% | 0.38% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.27% | 2.31% | 0.04% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.10% | 1.70% | 0.40% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.28% | 1.22% | 1.06% |
72.0% of QQA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQA or VTI?
QQA has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQA or VTI?
Over the past year QQA returned +19.47% vs +16.78% for VTI, so QQA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQA annualized +18.47% vs +16.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQA or VTI?
QQA has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQA -19.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QQA and VTI?
QQA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQA and VTI?
72.0% of QQA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.1% of VTI's is in holdings QQA also owns. They hold 92 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in QQA and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQA or VTI?
QQA yields 9.92% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QQA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQA led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.