QQQ vs ROUS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, QQQ or ROUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, ROUS over 1Y. ROUS is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ROUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.19% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $744M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.31% |
| Holdings | 107 | 325 |
| YTD Return | +15.21% | +15.63%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.78% | +19.99%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.58%Best | +19.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.93%Best | +11.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -35.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,195Best | $17,553 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 11.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 25, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 26, 2015 to Sep 16, 2026 (11.6 years).
QQQ vs ROUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs ROUS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +19.78% while ROUS returned +19.99%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.21% versus a gain of 15.63% for ROUS.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.58% per year against +19.02% for ROUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.93% and +11.91% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +17.87% annualized vs +9.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 14.6% for ROUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -35.5% for ROUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ROUS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $19 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.31% for ROUS.
Holdings Overlap
72.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ROUS also owns. 26.0% of ROUS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside ROUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
55 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 321 in ROUS, against full books of 107 and 325.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 260 positions for ROUS that do not appear in our book for QQQ (72.9% of the fund), and 41 for QQQ that do not appear in ROUS (25.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in ROUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 0.71% | 7.73% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 1.00% | 6.27% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 0.95% | 4.81% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.94% | 3.49% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 0.25% | 4.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 1.35% | 2.01% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 0.16% | 3.29% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 0.36% | 2.80% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.10% | 1.25% | 0.85% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 0.49% | 2.29% |
72.2% of QQQ is already inside ROUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ROUS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ROUS charges 0.19%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or ROUS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +19.78% vs +19.99% for ROUS, so ROUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +17.87% vs +9.74% for ROUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ROUS?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 14.6% for ROUS. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs ROUS -35.5%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ROUS?
QQQ and ROUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ROUS?
72.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ROUS also owns. 26.0% of ROUS's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 321 in ROUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ROUS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ROUS yields 1.31%, so ROUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROUS better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, ROUS over 1Y. ROUS is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.