QQQ vs RSMV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RSMV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSMV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $437.3B | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 208 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +12.98%Best | +0.16% |
| 1Y Return | +11.59%Best | +1.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.05% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.74% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -17.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,729Best | $11,138 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.9%Best | 57.5% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Teucrium |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.8 years).
QQQ vs RSMV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RSMV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is an ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year QQQ returned +11.59% while RSMV returned +1.57%. Year to date, QQQ is up 12.98% versus a gain of 0.16% for RSMV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 11.3% for RSMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -17.6% for RSMV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSMV charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 0.98% for RSMV.
Holdings Overlap
38.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings RSMV also owns. 38.9% of RSMV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 21 in RSMV, against full books of 208 and 47.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for RSMV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (60.7% of the fund), and 84 for QQQ that do not appear in RSMV (58.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RSMV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.68% | 4.19% | 3.49% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.05% | 3.78% | 4.27% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.16% | 4.13% | 2.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.47% | 3.51% | 0.96% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.90% | 3.69% | 0.21% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.37% | 4.05% | 0.68% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 1.96% | 4.32% | 2.36% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 1.28% | 3.75% | 2.47% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.06% | 3.72% | 2.66% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 0.90% | 3.71% | 2.81% |
38.9% of RSMV is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSMV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSMV charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSMV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +11.59% vs +1.57% for RSMV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +19.25% vs +6.17% for RSMV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSMV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 11.3% for RSMV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs RSMV -17.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSMV?
QQQ and RSMV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSMV?
38.9% of RSMV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 38.9% of RSMV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 21 in RSMV.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSMV?
QQQ yields 0.43% while RSMV yields 0.98%, so RSMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSMV better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.