RSMV vs VYM
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RSMV or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSMV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 23 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +4.36% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.44% | +13.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,607 | $12,712Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.7 years).
RSMV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
RSMV vs VYM Performance
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSMV returned +8.44% while VYM returned +13.75%. Year to date, RSMV is up 4.36% versus a gain of 10.00% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSMV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.3% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for RSMV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSMV charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMV currently yields 0.95% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
57.1% of RSMV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.0% of VYM's money is in holdings RSMV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in RSMV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 23 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 21 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 516 positions RSMV does not, 76.0% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.35%, CSCO 1.86%, UNH 1.52%, CAT 1.50%, HD 1.34%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSMV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.81% | 3.82% | 0.99% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 4.90% | 2.63% | 2.27% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.73% | 2.51% | 2.22% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.77% | 1.80% | 2.97% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 4.83% | 1.66% | 3.17% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.89% | 1.48% | 3.41% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 4.82% | 1.38% | 3.44% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 4.93% | 1.21% | 3.72% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 4.71% | 1.37% | 3.34% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 4.66% | 1.31% | 3.35% |
57.1% of RSMV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSMV or VYM?
RSMV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSMV or VYM?
Over the past year RSMV returned +8.44% vs +13.75% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMV annualized +9.16% vs +15.16% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSMV or VYM?
RSMV has been the more volatile fund at 11.3% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RSMV -17.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both RSMV and VYM?
RSMV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSMV and VYM?
57.1% of RSMV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.0% of VYM's is in holdings RSMV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in RSMV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSMV or VYM?
RSMV yields 0.95% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RSMV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.