QQQ vs TUGN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TUGN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $85M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 11.55% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +15.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +23.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +20.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 17.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -23.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Gateway Credit Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 18, 2022 |
QQQ vs TUGN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) is a ETF from Gateway Credit Partners. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while TUGN returned +23.33%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 15.74% for TUGN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +20.58% for TUGN. Across the full 4-year window we track, TUGN has the edge at +14.64% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.1% for TUGN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -23.4% for TUGN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TUGN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 11.55% for TUGN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TUGN share 89 holdings out of 111 unique holdings combined, representing a 88.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TUGN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TUGN charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TUGN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +23.33% for TUGN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +14.64% for TUGN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TUGN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.1% for TUGN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TUGN -23.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TUGN?
QQQ and TUGN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TUGN?
QQQ and TUGN share 89 common holdings with a 88.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 111 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TUGN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TUGN yields 11.55%, so TUGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.