QQQ vs USMD

QQQ vs USMD

Which is better, QQQ or USMD?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. USMD is less concentrated, with 46.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: USMD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQUSMD
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.87%
AUM$483.5B$304,629.33
Dividend Yield0.44%0.00%
Holdings107121
YTD Return+17.95%+25.80%Best
1Y Return+21.77%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.24%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%46.1%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)CORE VALUES ALPHA
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Feb 6, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs USMD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs USMD Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and CoreValues America First Technology ETF (USMD) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 25.80% for USMD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while USMD charges 0.87%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $87 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for USMD.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in USMD49.9%
USMD already in QQQ69.7%

49.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings USMD also owns. 69.7% of USMD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

27 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 120 in USMD, against full books of 107 and 121.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 89 positions for USMD that do not appear in our book for QQQ (29.9% of the fund), and 69 for QQQ that do not appear in USMD (47.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in USMDDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%4.54%3.90%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%5.22%0.54%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%4.84%0.17%
TSLATesla Inc2.56%5.79%3.23%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.36%4.80%1.44%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%4.39%0.94%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc1.60%5.93%4.33%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%4.05%0.89%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%2.77%1.66%
INTCIntel Corporation2.23%3.57%1.34%

69.7% of USMD is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQUSMD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or USMD?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while USMD charges 0.87%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and USMD?

69.7% of USMD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 69.7% of USMD's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 120 in USMD.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or USMD?

QQQ yields 0.44% while USMD yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is USMD better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. USMD is less concentrated, with 46.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.