QQQ vs VBCI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, QQQ or VBCI?
Large Cap Growth against Long Term Mid Quality.
VBCI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | VBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $483.5B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 107 | 376 |
| YTD Return | +21.22%Best | -0.26% |
| 1Y Return | +23.58% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.82% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Long Term Mid Quality |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs VBCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs VBCI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QQQ is up 21.22% versus a loss of 0.26% for VBCI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VBCI charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $8 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.74% for VBCI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 31.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings VBCI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VBCI, our book for it covers 23.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 76 in VBCI, against full books of 107 and 376.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in VBCI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 0.11% | 7.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 0.30% | 5.46% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 0.91% | 3.76% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 1.62% | 1.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 0.90% | 2.26% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.86% | 0.10% | 1.76% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc. | 1.12% | 0.18% | 0.94% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.83% | 0.38% | 0.45% |
| SNPSSynopsys | 0.34% | 0.67% | 0.33% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.73% | 0.19% | 0.54% |
31.0% of QQQ is already inside VBCI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VBCI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VBCI charges 0.08%. VBCI is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VBCI?
At least 31.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings VBCI also owns. Our book for VBCI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 76 in VBCI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VBCI?
QQQ yields 0.44% while VBCI yields 1.74%, so VBCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VBCI better than QQQ?
VBCI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.