QSIX vs VOO
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QSIX or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QSIX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.79% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 107 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +19.08%Best | +13.31% |
| 1Y Return | +22.02%Best | +17.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $15,114Best | $13,778 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2024 to Sep 23, 2026 (2 years).
QSIX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
QSIX vs VOO Performance
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QSIX returned +22.02% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, QSIX is up 19.08% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QSIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 12.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for QSIX and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIX charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIX currently yields 3.79% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
87.0% of QSIX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.6% of VOO's money is in holdings QSIX also owns.
Most of QSIX is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
85 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QSIX and 494 in VOO, against full books of 107 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 402 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QSIX (45.5% of the fund), and 12 for QSIX that do not appear in VOO (7.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QSIX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.20% | 7.55% | 0.65% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.91% | 7.05% | 0.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.46% | 5.36% | 0.10% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.09% | 4.13% | 0.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.90% | 3.24% | 0.34% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.66% | 1.44% | 3.22% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.50% | 2.86% | 0.36% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.69% | 2.62% | 0.07% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.68% | 1.90% | 0.78% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.16% | 1.21% | 1.95% |
87.0% of QSIX is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIX or VOO?
QSIX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QSIX or VOO?
Over the past year QSIX returned +22.02% vs +17.07% for VOO, so QSIX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QSIX annualized +22.94% vs +17.38% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QSIX or VOO?
QSIX has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 12.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QSIX -19.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both QSIX and VOO?
QSIX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIX and VOO?
87.0% of QSIX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.6% of VOO's is in holdings QSIX also owns. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QSIX and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIX or VOO?
QSIX yields 3.79% while VOO yields 1.04%, so QSIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QSIX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QSIX led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.