QSIX vs VTI
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QSIX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.78% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.82% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.96% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
QSIX vs VTI Performance
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QSIX returned +23.96% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, QSIX is up 14.82% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QSIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for QSIX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIX charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIX currently yields 3.78% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QSIX and VTI share 90 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIX or VTI?
QSIX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QSIX or VTI?
Over the past year QSIX returned +23.96% vs +21.39% for VTI, so QSIX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QSIX annualized +21.83% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QSIX or VTI?
QSIX has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QSIX -19.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QSIX and VTI?
QSIX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIX and VTI?
QSIX and VTI share 90 common holdings with a 47.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIX or VTI?
QSIX yields 3.78% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QSIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.