QYLG vs VTI
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QYLG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $169M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 17.67% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.26% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.95% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.53% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
QYLG vs VTI Performance
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QYLG returned +25.95% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QYLG is up 14.26% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QYLG compounded at +20.53% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.29% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QYLG has the edge at +13.82% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.3% for QYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.0% for QYLG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QYLG charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QYLG currently yields 17.67% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QYLG and VTI share 90 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QYLG or VTI?
QYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QYLG or VTI?
Over the past year QYLG returned +25.95% vs +22.35% for VTI, so QYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QYLG annualized +13.82% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QYLG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.3% for QYLG. Worst drawdown: QYLG -30.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QYLG and VTI?
QYLG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QYLG and VTI?
QYLG and VTI share 90 common holdings with a 47.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QYLG or VTI?
QYLG yields 17.67% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.