QYLG vs VOO
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QYLG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $169M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 17.67% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.26% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.95% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.53% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QYLG vs VOO Performance
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QYLG returned +25.95% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QYLG is up 14.26% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, QYLG compounded at +20.53% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.29% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QYLG has the edge at +13.82% annualized vs +13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.0% for QYLG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QYLG charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QYLG currently yields 17.67% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QYLG and VOO share 88 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QYLG or VOO?
QYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QYLG or VOO?
Over the past year QYLG returned +25.95% vs +21.87% for VOO, so QYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QYLG annualized +13.82% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QYLG or VOO?
QYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QYLG -30.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QYLG and VOO?
QYLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QYLG and VOO?
QYLG and VOO share 88 common holdings with a 54.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QYLG or VOO?
QYLG yields 17.67% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.