QYLG vs VYM
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QYLG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $169M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 17.67% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +14.26% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.95% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.53% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QYLG vs VYM Performance
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QYLG returned +25.95% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, QYLG is up 14.26% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, QYLG compounded at +20.53% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.29% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QYLG has the edge at +13.82% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.0% for QYLG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QYLG charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QYLG currently yields 17.67% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QYLG and VYM share 28 holdings out of 678 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QYLG or VYM?
QYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QYLG or VYM?
Over the past year QYLG returned +25.95% vs +23.24% for VYM, so QYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QYLG annualized +13.82% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QYLG or VYM?
QYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QYLG -30.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QYLG and VYM?
QYLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QYLG and VYM?
QYLG and VYM share 28 common holdings with a 15.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 678 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QYLG or VYM?
QYLG yields 17.67% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.