RANK vs VOO

RANK vs VOO

Which is better, RANK or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRANKVOO
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$12M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings53509
YTD Return-10.24%+12.25%Best
1Y Return-+17.03%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Top 10 Weight48.1%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 29, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RANK vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RANK vs VOO Performance

Defiance KSM TipRanks Analyst ETF (RANK) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RANK is down 10.24% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RANK charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RANK currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

RANK already in VOO92.5%
VOO already in RANK31.0%

92.5% of RANK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 31.0% of VOO's money is in holdings RANK also owns.

Most of RANK is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

41 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in RANK and 494 in VOO, against full books of 53 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 446 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RANK (68.2% of the fund), and 9 for RANK that do not appear in VOO (6.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RANKWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.41%7.55%2.14%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.43%4.13%2.30%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.94%1.44%4.50%
WMTWalmart, Inc.5.80%0.76%5.04%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.5.12%1.41%3.71%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.38%2.86%0.52%
GEGeneral Electric Co.5.07%0.58%4.49%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.41%3.24%0.83%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.23%2.62%0.39%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.4.05%0.63%3.42%

92.5% of RANK is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RANKVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RANK or VOO?

RANK has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RANK and VOO?

92.5% of RANK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 31.0% of VOO's is in holdings RANK also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in RANK and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, RANK or VOO?

RANK yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than RANK?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.