RDVI vs VOO
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RDVI or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RDVI is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RDVI | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.7B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.89% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 73 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.91% | +11.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.49% | +15.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.35% | +20.82%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $19,196 | $21,717Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.7%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.9 years).
RDVI vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
RDVI vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RDVI returned +15.49% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, RDVI is up 8.91% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Over three years, RDVI compounded at +17.35% per year against +20.82% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +22.00% annualized vs +18.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDVI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 13.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for RDVI and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RDVI charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RDVI currently yields 7.89% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
92.6% of RDVI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.4% of VOO's money is in holdings RDVI also owns.
Most of RDVI is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
63 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in RDVI and 494 in VOO, against full books of 73 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 424 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RDVI (59.7% of the fund), and 7 for RDVI that do not appear in VOO (5.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RDVI | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.10% | 7.55% | 5.45% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.57% | 7.05% | 5.48% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.96% | 5.36% | 3.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.01% | 3.24% | 1.23% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 3.06% | 0.57% | 2.49% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.96% | 0.63% | 2.33% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.06% | 1.46% | 0.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.52% | 1.90% | 0.38% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.44% | 0.07% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.01% | 0.93% | 1.08% |
92.6% of RDVI is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RDVI or VOO?
RDVI has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RDVI or VOO?
Over the past year RDVI returned +15.49% vs +15.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RDVI annualized +18.20% vs +22.00% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RDVI or VOO?
RDVI has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 13.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RDVI -18.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both RDVI and VOO?
RDVI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RDVI and VOO?
92.6% of RDVI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.4% of VOO's is in holdings RDVI also owns. They hold 63 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in RDVI and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RDVI or VOO?
RDVI yields 7.89% while VOO yields 1.04%, so RDVI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RDVI?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RDVI is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.