REGS vs TCHP
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, REGS or TCHP?
REGS has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REGS | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $77M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 124 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +16.92%Best | +5.39% |
| 1Y Return | - | +5.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.06% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.36% |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.2%Best | 56.7% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2026 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
REGS vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
REGS vs TCHP Performance
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, REGS is up 16.92% versus a gain of 5.39% for TCHP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REGS charges 0.35% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $57 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REGS currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
55.5% of REGS's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 68.1% of TCHP's money is in holdings REGS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in REGS and 65 in TCHP, against full books of 124 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for REGS (27.7% of the fund), and 42 for REGS that do not appear in TCHP (40.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in REGS | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.05% | 15.94% | 4.89% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.14% | 4.54% | 3.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.63% | 5.96% | 0.33% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.79% | 6.31% | 1.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.84% | 4.38% | 0.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.73% | 3.51% | 1.22% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.68% | 5.85% | 4.17% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.42% | 3.19% | 0.23% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.51% | 3.64% | 1.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.17% | 3.32% | 1.15% |
68.1% of TCHP is already inside REGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REGS or TCHP?
REGS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while TCHP charges 0.57%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between REGS and TCHP?
68.1% of TCHP's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 68.1% of TCHP's is in holdings REGS also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in REGS and 65 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, REGS or TCHP?
REGS yields 0.00% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so TCHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than REGS?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.