RND vs VTI
First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RND or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RND led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RND | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 100 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.56% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.87% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $16,577Best | $15,462 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (2.4 years).
RND vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
RND vs VTI Performance
First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RND returned +9.87% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, RND is up 6.56% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for RND and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RND charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RND currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.5% of RND's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 40.1% of VTI's money is in holdings RND also owns.
Most of RND is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in RND and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 100 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,102 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RND (57.3% of the fund), and 0 for RND that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RND | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.56% | 4.79% | 5.77% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.57% | 6.40% | 2.17% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.50% | 6.29% | 2.21% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.46% | 3.65% | 4.81% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 7.37% | 2.90% | 4.47% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.81% | 2.56% | 1.25% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.95% | 1.70% | 2.25% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.74% | 1.35% | 2.39% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.40% | 1.22% | 2.18% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 4.08% | 0.29% | 3.79% |
97.5% of RND is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RND or VTI?
RND has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RND or VTI?
Over the past year RND returned +9.87% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RND annualized +23.44% vs +19.91% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RND or VTI?
RND has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RND -23.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RND and VTI?
RND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RND and VTI?
97.5% of RND's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 40.1% of VTI's is in holdings RND also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in RND and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RND or VTI?
RND yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RND?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RND led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.