RSMV vs VOO
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RSMV or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSMV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 37 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.05% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.99% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $11,630 | $13,470Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
RSMV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
RSMV vs VOO Performance
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSMV returned +8.99% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, RSMV is up 4.05% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 11.6% for RSMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for RSMV and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSMV charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMV currently yields 0.95% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
81.6% of RSMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.8% of VOO's money is in holdings RSMV also owns.
Most of RSMV is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, RSMV as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
32 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in RSMV and 505 in VOO, against full books of 37 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RSMV (69.7% of the fund), and 2 for RSMV that do not appear in VOO (17.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSMV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.04% | 4.30% | 1.26% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.00% | 6.59% | 6.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.18% | 1.47% | 1.71% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.95% | 1.47% | 1.48% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 2.99% | 1.26% | 1.73% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 3.06% | 0.95% | 2.11% |
| VVisa Inc | 3.03% | 0.87% | 2.16% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 3.02% | 0.88% | 2.14% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 3.40% | 0.49% | 2.91% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.96% | 0.89% | 2.07% |
81.6% of RSMV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSMV or VOO?
RSMV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSMV or VOO?
Over the past year RSMV returned +8.99% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMV annualized +9.29% vs +19.15% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSMV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 11.6% for RSMV. Worst drawdown: RSMV -17.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both RSMV and VOO?
RSMV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSMV and VOO?
81.6% of RSMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.8% of VOO's is in holdings RSMV also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in RSMV and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSMV or VOO?
RSMV yields 0.95% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RSMV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.