SCLZ vs VTI
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SCLZ or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCLZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.11% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 117 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.06% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.29% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $12,449 | $15,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Swan Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).
SCLZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
SCLZ vs VTI Performance
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is an ETF from Swan Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCLZ returned +6.29% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, SCLZ is up 4.06% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 7.7% for SCLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for SCLZ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCLZ charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCLZ currently yields 8.11% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.2% of SCLZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 56.0% of VTI's money is in holdings SCLZ also owns.
Most of SCLZ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SCLZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 117 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,081 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SCLZ (41.5% of the fund), and 1 for SCLZ that do not appear in VTI (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCLZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.34% | 6.40% | 0.06% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.76% | 6.29% | 0.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.41% | 4.79% | 1.62% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.69% | 3.65% | 0.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.26% | 2.56% | 0.70% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.43% | 1.70% | 1.73% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.75% | 2.90% | 1.15% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.24% | 1.31% | 1.93% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.17% | 1.28% | 1.89% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.90% | 1.29% | 1.61% |
99.2% of SCLZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCLZ or VTI?
SCLZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCLZ or VTI?
Over the past year SCLZ returned +6.29% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCLZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 7.7% for SCLZ. Worst drawdown: SCLZ -12.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SCLZ and VTI?
SCLZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCLZ and VTI?
99.2% of SCLZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 56.0% of VTI's is in holdings SCLZ also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SCLZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCLZ or VTI?
SCLZ yields 8.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SCLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SCLZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.