SCLZ vs VTI
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCLZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.01% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.27% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.74% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Swan Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SCLZ vs VTI Performance
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is a ETF from Swan Capital Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCLZ returned +9.74% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, SCLZ is up 4.27% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.9% for SCLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for SCLZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCLZ charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCLZ currently yields 8.01% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SCLZ and VTI share 56 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCLZ or VTI?
SCLZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCLZ or VTI?
Over the past year SCLZ returned +9.74% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SCLZ annualized +9.27% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCLZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.9% for SCLZ. Worst drawdown: SCLZ -12.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SCLZ and VTI?
SCLZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SCLZ and VTI?
SCLZ and VTI share 56 common holdings with a 48.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCLZ or VTI?
SCLZ yields 8.01% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SCLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.