SCLZ vs VOO
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SCLZ or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCLZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.11% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 117 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +5.25% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.97% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $12,586 | $15,884Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Swan Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.6 years).
SCLZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
SCLZ vs VOO Performance
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) is an ETF from Swan Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCLZ returned +6.97% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, SCLZ is up 5.25% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 7.8% for SCLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for SCLZ and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCLZ charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCLZ currently yields 8.11% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of SCLZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 63.3% of VOO's money is in holdings SCLZ also owns.
Most of SCLZ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
69 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SCLZ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 117 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 419 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SCLZ (35.9% of the fund), and 2 for SCLZ that do not appear in VOO (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCLZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.34% | 7.55% | 1.21% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.76% | 7.05% | 1.29% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.41% | 5.36% | 1.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.69% | 4.13% | 0.44% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.26% | 2.86% | 0.40% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.43% | 1.90% | 1.53% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.75% | 3.24% | 1.49% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.24% | 1.46% | 1.78% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.17% | 1.46% | 1.71% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.90% | 1.44% | 1.46% |
99.1% of SCLZ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCLZ or VOO?
SCLZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCLZ or VOO?
Over the past year SCLZ returned +6.97% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCLZ or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 7.8% for SCLZ. Worst drawdown: SCLZ -12.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SCLZ and VOO?
SCLZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCLZ and VOO?
99.1% of SCLZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 63.3% of VOO's is in holdings SCLZ also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SCLZ and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCLZ or VOO?
SCLZ yields 8.11% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SCLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SCLZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.