SEMG vs VTI
Suncoast Select Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SEMG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEMG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $63M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +3.02% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.72% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2%Best | 11.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $11,068 | $13,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Suncoast Equity Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.4 years).
SEMG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
SEMG vs VTI Performance
Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) is an ETF from Suncoast Equity Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEMG returned +3.72% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SEMG is up 3.02% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.5% compared with 11.2% for SEMG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for SEMG and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEMG charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEMG currently yields 0.05% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
92.8% of SEMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.8% of VTI's money is in holdings SEMG also owns.
Most of SEMG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in SEMG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 47 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,130 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SEMG (66.6% of the fund), and 1 for SEMG that do not appear in VTI (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SEMG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.03% | 6.40% | 4.63% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.52% | 2.90% | 8.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.78% | 4.79% | 3.99% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.23% | 6.29% | 1.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.78% | 2.56% | 2.22% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 6.31% | 0.83% | 5.48% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.53% | 1.35% | 3.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.62% | 1.70% | 1.92% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 4.93% | 0.14% | 4.79% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.18% | 0.63% | 3.55% |
92.8% of SEMG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEMG or VTI?
SEMG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SEMG or VTI?
Over the past year SEMG returned +3.72% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SEMG annualized +7.52% vs +22.77% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SEMG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.5% annualized versus 11.2% for SEMG. Worst drawdown: SEMG -15.8% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both SEMG and VTI?
SEMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SEMG and VTI?
92.8% of SEMG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.8% of VTI's is in holdings SEMG also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in SEMG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEMG or VTI?
SEMG yields 0.05% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SEMG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.