SPY vs XCHG

SPY vs XCHG

Which is better, SPY or XCHG?

SPY costs less.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPYXCHG
Expense Ratio0.09%Best0.50%
AUM$804.7B$710M
Dividend Yield0.98%0.36%
Holdings505591
YTD Return+12.47%Best+9.82%
1Y Return+17.51%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.18%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.88%-
Top 10 Weight38.0%Best41.3%
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementAllianceBernstein L.P.
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 22, 1993Dec 12, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SPY vs XCHG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SPY vs XCHG Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Year to date, SPY is up 12.47% versus a gain of 9.82% for XCHG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPY charges 0.09% per year while XCHG charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $50 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 0.36% for XCHG.

Holdings Overlap

SPY already in XCHG86.8%
XCHG already in SPY87.2%

86.8% of SPY's money is in holdings XCHG also owns. 87.2% of XCHG's money is in holdings SPY also owns.

Most of XCHG is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

367 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 586 in XCHG, against full books of 505 and 591.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 93 positions for XCHG that do not appear in our book for SPY (8.0% of the fund), and 131 for SPY that do not appear in XCHG (12.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SPYWeight in XCHGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.71%8.06%0.35%
AAPLApple, Inc6.83%5.11%1.72%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.50%6.20%0.70%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.08%4.97%0.89%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.67%3.91%1.24%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.97%3.49%0.52%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.33%2.30%1.03%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.94%2.85%0.91%
VVisa Inc0.92%2.78%1.86%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.33%0.91%0.42%

87.2% of XCHG is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SPYXCHG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPY or XCHG?

SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XCHG charges 0.50%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SPY and XCHG?

87.2% of XCHG's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 87.2% of XCHG's is in holdings SPY also owns. They hold 367 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 586 in XCHG.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or XCHG?

SPY yields 0.98% while XCHG yields 0.36%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XCHG better than SPY?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.