SPY vs ZALT
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | ZALT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $821.1B | $782M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +5.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.82% | +9.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.98% | +10.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 3.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -8.2% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Oct 2, 2023 |
SPY vs ZALT Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year SPY returned +21.82% while ZALT returned +9.69%. Year to date, SPY is up 12.68% versus a gain of 5.58% for ZALT.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +21.98% per year against +10.83% for ZALT. Across the full 3-year window we track, ZALT has the edge at +10.83% annualized vs +8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.9% for ZALT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $69 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 1.01% against 0.00% for ZALT.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or ZALT?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while ZALT charges 0.69%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPY or ZALT?
Over the past year SPY returned +21.82% vs +9.69% for ZALT, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SPY annualized +8.81% vs +10.83% for ZALT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPY or ZALT?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.9% for ZALT. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs ZALT -8.2%.
Should I hold both SPY and ZALT?
SPY and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or ZALT?
SPY yields 1.01% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.