SQS vs VOO

SQS vs VOO

Which is better, SQS or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSQSVOO
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM$1.4B$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings74506
YTD Return+10.79%+12.75%Best
1Y Return-+15.60%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.95%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.55%
Top 10 Weight55.6%37.6%Best
Fund FamilySapient Capital, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 13, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SQS vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SQS vs VOO Performance

Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) is an ETF from Sapient Capital, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SQS is up 10.79% versus a gain of 12.75% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SQS charges 0.80% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SQS currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

SQS already in VOO90.8%
VOO already in SQS42.7%

90.8% of SQS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.7% of VOO's money is in holdings SQS also owns.

Most of SQS is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

31 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SQS and 494 in VOO, against full books of 74 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 456 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SQS (56.4% of the fund), and 4 for SQS that do not appear in VOO (6.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SQSWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp9.39%7.55%1.84%
AAPLApple, Inc7.69%7.05%0.64%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.63%5.36%0.27%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A7.70%3.24%4.46%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.42%4.13%1.29%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.79%2.86%0.93%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.4.77%1.41%3.36%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.92%1.44%2.48%
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.34%1.46%1.88%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.89%1.90%0.99%

90.8% of SQS is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SQSVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SQS or VOO?

SQS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SQS and VOO?

90.8% of SQS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.7% of VOO's is in holdings SQS also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SQS and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, SQS or VOO?

SQS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than SQS?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.