TCAF vs VOO
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TCAF or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TCAF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.6B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 105 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.83% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.24% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.38% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $16,760 | $18,141Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 14, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 15, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.3 years).
TCAF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
TCAF vs VOO Performance
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TCAF returned +14.24% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, TCAF is up 10.83% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, TCAF compounded at +18.38% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 12.2% for TCAF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for TCAF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TCAF charges 0.31% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $3 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TCAF currently yields 0.47% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
74.9% of TCAF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 46.3% of VOO's money is in holdings TCAF also owns.
Most of TCAF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
61 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in TCAF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 105 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 427 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TCAF (52.9% of the fund), and 29 for TCAF that do not appear in VOO (13.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TCAF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.44% | 7.55% | 2.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.66% | 7.05% | 2.39% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.16% | 5.36% | 0.80% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.15% | 4.13% | 1.02% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.19% | 3.24% | 0.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.32% | 2.86% | 0.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.10% | 1.90% | 1.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.65% | 2.62% | 0.97% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.45% | 1.46% | 0.01% |
| CNPCenterpoint Energy Inc. | 2.80% | 0.04% | 2.76% |
74.9% of TCAF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TCAF or VOO?
TCAF has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TCAF or VOO?
Over the past year TCAF returned +14.24% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TCAF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 12.2% for TCAF. Worst drawdown: TCAF -16.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both TCAF and VOO?
TCAF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TCAF and VOO?
74.9% of TCAF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 46.3% of VOO's is in holdings TCAF also owns. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in TCAF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TCAF or VOO?
TCAF yields 0.47% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TCAF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.