TOLZ vs VTI
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TOLZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $175M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 116 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.06% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.00% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.17% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
TOLZ vs VTI Performance
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TOLZ returned +12.06% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, TOLZ is up 9.94% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, TOLZ compounded at +15.00% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.17% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.4% for TOLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for TOLZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TOLZ charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOLZ currently yields 2.97% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TOLZ and VTI share 32 holdings out of 2868 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TOLZ or VTI?
TOLZ has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TOLZ or VTI?
Over the past year TOLZ returned +12.06% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), TOLZ annualized +4.69% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TOLZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.4% for TOLZ. Worst drawdown: TOLZ -39.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TOLZ and VTI?
TOLZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TOLZ and VTI?
TOLZ and VTI share 32 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2868 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TOLZ or VTI?
TOLZ yields 2.97% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TOLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.