TOLZ vs VTI
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TOLZ or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TOLZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 116 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.94% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.69% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.14% | +20.83%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.58% | +11.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,410 | $17,537Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2014 to Sep 14, 2026 (12.5 years).
TOLZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.5 years both funds cover.
TOLZ vs VTI Performance
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TOLZ returned +9.69% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, TOLZ is up 6.94% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, TOLZ compounded at +13.14% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.58% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.22% annualized vs +4.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.4% for TOLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for TOLZ and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TOLZ charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOLZ currently yields 3.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
41.9% of TOLZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.4% of VTI's money is in holdings TOLZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
33 positions in common, counted across the 112 positions we hold weights for in TOLZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 116 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,123 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TOLZ (96.1% of the fund), and 13 for TOLZ that do not appear in VTI (11.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TOLZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 4.45% | 0.12% | 4.33% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 3.97% | 0.11% | 3.86% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 3.06% | 0.08% | 2.98% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 3.05% | 0.08% | 2.97% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 2.96% | 0.08% | 2.88% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.93% | 0.08% | 2.85% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 2.59% | 0.08% | 2.51% |
| EXCExelon | 2.17% | 0.07% | 2.10% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc | 1.91% | 0.06% | 1.85% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 1.61% | 0.05% | 1.56% |
41.9% of TOLZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TOLZ or VTI?
TOLZ has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TOLZ or VTI?
Over the past year TOLZ returned +9.69% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), TOLZ annualized +4.43% vs +12.22% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TOLZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.4% for TOLZ. Worst drawdown: TOLZ -39.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both TOLZ and VTI?
TOLZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TOLZ and VTI?
41.9% of TOLZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.4% of VTI's is in holdings TOLZ also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 112 positions we hold weights for in TOLZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TOLZ or VTI?
TOLZ yields 3.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so TOLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TOLZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.