TOLZ vs VOO
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TOLZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $175M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 116 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.06% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.00% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.17% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TOLZ vs VOO Performance
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TOLZ returned +12.06% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, TOLZ is up 9.94% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, TOLZ compounded at +15.00% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.17% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TOLZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for TOLZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TOLZ charges 0.46% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOLZ currently yields 2.97% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TOLZ and VOO share 18 holdings out of 600 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TOLZ or VOO?
TOLZ has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TOLZ or VOO?
Over the past year TOLZ returned +12.06% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), TOLZ annualized +4.69% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TOLZ or VOO?
TOLZ has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TOLZ -39.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TOLZ and VOO?
TOLZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TOLZ and VOO?
TOLZ and VOO share 18 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 600 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TOLZ or VOO?
TOLZ yields 2.97% while VOO yields 1.08%, so TOLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.