TSIC vs VYM
Truth Social American Icons ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, TSIC or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TSIC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 54 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -2.63% | +10.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.89% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Truth Social Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TSIC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TSIC vs VYM Performance
Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TSIC is down 2.63% versus a gain of 10.24% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TSIC charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TSIC currently yields 0.93% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
59.4% of TSIC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.2% of VYM's money is in holdings TSIC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
29 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in TSIC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 54 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 52 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 499 positions TSIC does not, 87.8% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.35%, JPM 3.82%, XOM 2.63%, JNJ 2.51%, CSCO 1.86%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TSIC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 7.45% | 1.34% | 6.11% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 6.88% | 1.38% | 5.50% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 5.37% | 0.77% | 4.60% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 4.47% | 1.37% | 3.10% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 4.29% | 0.46% | 3.83% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 3.94% | 0.78% | 3.16% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 3.53% | 0.47% | 3.06% |
| FFord Motor Credit | 3.33% | 0.23% | 3.10% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 3.25% | 0.29% | 2.96% |
| TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.0833 | 1.83% | 0.27% | 1.56% |
59.4% of TSIC is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TSIC or VYM?
TSIC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TSIC and VYM?
59.4% of TSIC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.2% of VYM's is in holdings TSIC also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in TSIC and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, TSIC or VYM?
TSIC yields 0.93% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than TSIC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.