TSIC vs VOO
Truth Social American Icons ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TSIC or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TSIC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -2.63% | +13.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Truth Social Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TSIC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TSIC vs VOO Performance
Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TSIC is down 2.63% versus a gain of 13.82% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TSIC charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TSIC currently yields 0.93% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
96.6% of TSIC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.7% of VOO's money is in holdings TSIC also owns.
Most of TSIC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
45 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in TSIC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 54 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 52 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 442 positions TSIC does not, 92.4% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TSIC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 7.45% | 0.51% | 6.94% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 7.10% | 0.66% | 6.44% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 7.09% | 0.47% | 6.62% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 6.88% | 0.53% | 6.35% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 5.30% | 0.76% | 4.54% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 5.37% | 0.30% | 5.07% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 4.82% | 0.22% | 4.60% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 4.47% | 0.52% | 3.95% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 4.29% | 0.18% | 4.11% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 3.94% | 0.30% | 3.64% |
96.6% of TSIC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TSIC or VOO?
TSIC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TSIC and VOO?
96.6% of TSIC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.7% of VOO's is in holdings TSIC also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in TSIC and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TSIC or VOO?
TSIC yields 0.93% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TSIC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.