IVV vs TSIC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Truth Social American Icons ETF
Which is better, IVV or TSIC?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSIC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.82% |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +12.70%Best | +0.60% |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.75% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 57.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Truth Social Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TSIC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TSIC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds. Year to date, IVV is up 12.70% versus a gain of 0.60% for TSIC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSIC charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.82% for TSIC.
Holdings Overlap
6.7% of IVV's money is in holdings TSIC also owns. 98.9% of TSIC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of TSIC is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
47 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 52 in TSIC, against full books of 508 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 504 and 52 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 446 positions TSIC does not, 92.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TSIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 0.63% | 7.82% | 7.19% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.53% | 7.82% | 7.29% |
| KOCoca-cola Co. | 0.51% | 6.87% | 6.36% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.47% | 6.60% | 6.13% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.74% | 5.70% | 4.96% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.29% | 5.31% | 5.02% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 0.21% | 4.66% | 4.45% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 4.31% | 3.80% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 0.29% | 4.00% | 3.71% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 0.17% | 3.99% | 3.82% |
98.9% of TSIC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSIC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSIC charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TSIC?
98.9% of TSIC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 98.9% of TSIC's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 52 in TSIC.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSIC?
IVV yields 1.10% while TSIC yields 0.82%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSIC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.