QQQ vs TSIC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Truth Social American Icons ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TSIC?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TSIC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.93% |
| Holdings | 107 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +17.21%Best | -0.98% |
| 1Y Return | +22.10% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 56.7% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Truth Social Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs TSIC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TSIC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a loss of 0.98% for TSIC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TSIC charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.93% for TSIC.
Holdings Overlap
8.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings TSIC also owns. 34.3% of TSIC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 52 in TSIC, against full books of 107 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 102 and 52 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 85 positions TSIC does not, 88.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in TSIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.84% | 7.10% | 5.26% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.37% | 7.09% | 5.72% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 2.41% | 5.30% | 2.89% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.83% | 5.37% | 4.54% |
| MARMarriott International, Inc. | 0.42% | 1.87% | 1.45% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.36% | 1.89% | 1.53% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 0.41% | 1.41% | 1.00% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 0.37% | 1.31% | 0.94% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 0.13% | 1.43% | 1.30% |
| WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc | 0.29% | 0.87% | 0.58% |
34.3% of TSIC is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TSIC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TSIC charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TSIC?
34.3% of TSIC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 34.3% of TSIC's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 52 in TSIC.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TSIC?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TSIC yields 0.93%, so TSIC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSIC better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.