TUGN vs VOO
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TUGN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TUGN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $79M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.77% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.23% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.42% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Gateway Credit Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TUGN vs VOO Performance
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) is a ETF from Gateway Credit Partners and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TUGN returned +24.42% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, TUGN is up 19.23% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, TUGN compounded at +21.54% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, TUGN has the edge at +15.51% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TUGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for TUGN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TUGN charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TUGN currently yields 10.77% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TUGN and VOO share 87 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TUGN or VOO?
TUGN has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TUGN or VOO?
Over the past year TUGN returned +24.42% vs +22.02% for VOO, so TUGN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TUGN annualized +15.51% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TUGN or VOO?
TUGN has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TUGN -23.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TUGN and VOO?
TUGN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TUGN and VOO?
TUGN and VOO share 87 common holdings with a 50.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TUGN or VOO?
TUGN yields 10.77% while VOO yields 1.09%, so TUGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.