USCA vs VOO
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, USCA or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | USCA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.5B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 409 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.45% | +11.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.00% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.08% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $18,651 | $19,178Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 4, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 4, 2023 to Sep 15, 2026 (3.4 years).
USCA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
USCA vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USCA returned +11.00% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, USCA is up 8.45% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, USCA compounded at +19.08% per year against +21.01% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USCA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for USCA and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
USCA charges 0.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USCA currently yields 1.09% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
96.8% of USCA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 89.9% of VOO's money is in holdings USCA also owns.
Most of USCA is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
347 positions in common, counted across the 391 positions we hold weights for in USCA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 409 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 142 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for USCA (9.4% of the fund), and 36 for USCA that do not appear in VOO (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in USCA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.55% | 7.55% | 2.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.83% | 7.05% | 1.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.49% | 5.36% | 1.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.57% | 4.13% | 0.44% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.66% | 3.24% | 0.42% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.07% | 2.86% | 0.21% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.88% | 2.62% | 0.26% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.41% | 1.90% | 0.51% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.53% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.72% | 1.41% | 0.31% |
96.8% of USCA is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, USCA or VOO?
USCA has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, USCA or VOO?
Over the past year USCA returned +11.00% vs +15.94% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, USCA or VOO?
USCA has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: USCA -19.1% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both USCA and VOO?
USCA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between USCA and VOO?
96.8% of USCA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 89.9% of VOO's is in holdings USCA also owns. They hold 347 positions in common, counted across the 391 positions we hold weights for in USCA and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, USCA or VOO?
USCA yields 1.09% while VOO yields 1.04%, so USCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than USCA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.