USEW vs VOO

USEW vs VOO

Which is better, USEW or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. USEW is less concentrated, with 21.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: USEW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUSEWVOO
Expense Ratio0.30%0.03%Best
AUM$190M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.54%1.04%
Holdings428509
YTD Return+9.92%+12.25%Best
1Y Return-+17.03%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Top 10 Weight21.7%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyCambria Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 18, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

USEW vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

USEW vs VOO Performance

Cambria US EW ETF (USEW) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, USEW is up 9.92% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

USEW charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USEW currently yields 0.54% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

USEW already in VOO58.6%
VOO already in USEW92.2%

58.6% of USEW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 92.2% of VOO's money is in holdings USEW also owns.

Most of VOO is already inside USEW. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

342 positions in common, counted across the 427 positions we hold weights for in USEW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 428 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 146 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for USEW (7.1% of the fund), and 77 for USEW that do not appear in VOO (41.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in USEWWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc1.66%7.05%5.39%
NVDANvidia Corp1.08%7.55%6.47%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp1.22%5.36%4.14%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc0.98%4.13%3.15%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.02%2.86%1.84%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A0.48%3.24%2.76%
GOOGAlphabet Inc0.92%2.62%1.70%
METAMeta Platforms Inc0.74%1.90%1.16%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.08%1.46%0.38%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.0.50%1.41%0.91%

92.2% of VOO is already inside USEW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

USEWVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, USEW or VOO?

USEW has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between USEW and VOO?

92.2% of VOO's money is in holdings USEW also owns. 92.2% of VOO's is in holdings USEW also owns. They hold 342 positions in common, counted across the 427 positions we hold weights for in USEW and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, USEW or VOO?

USEW yields 0.54% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than USEW?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. USEW is less concentrated, with 21.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.