VOO vs XT
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
Which is better, VOO or XT?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XT over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. XT is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.46% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $3.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 6.87% |
| Holdings | 509 | 226 |
| YTD Return | +12.25% | +17.45%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.03% | +26.21%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.25%Best | +18.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08%Best | +6.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3%Best | -34.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,490Best | $13,934 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6% | 33.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Mar 19, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 24, 2015 to Sep 17, 2026 (11.5 years).
VOO vs XT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.5 years both funds cover.
VOO vs XT Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year VOO returned +17.03% while XT returned +26.21%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a gain of 17.45% for XT.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.25% per year against +18.51% for XT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and +6.86% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.73% annualized vs +11.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -34.4% for XT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XT charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 6.87% for XT.
Holdings Overlap
41.9% of VOO's money is in holdings XT also owns. 68.7% of XT's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
67 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 194 in XT, against full books of 509 and 226.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 30 positions for XT that do not appear in our book for VOO (5.0% of the fund), and 420 for VOO that do not appear in XT (57.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.55% | 4.12% | 3.43% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 4.23% | 1.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.13% | 2.89% | 1.24% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.24% | 2.12% | 1.12% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.41% | 3.92% | 2.51% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.36% | 3.50% | 2.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.86% | 1.99% | 0.87% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.96% | 3.38% | 2.42% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.39% | 3.49% | 3.10% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.42% | 3.02% | 2.60% |
68.7% of XT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XT?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XT charges 0.46%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or XT?
Over the past year VOO returned +17.03% vs +26.21% for XT, so XT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), VOO annualized +12.73% vs +11.65% for XT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOO or XT?
XT has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XT -34.4%.
Should I hold both VOO and XT?
VOO and XT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XT?
68.7% of XT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 68.7% of XT's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 67 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 194 in XT.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XT?
VOO yields 1.04% while XT yields 6.87%, so XT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XT better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XT over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. XT is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.