VOO vs XVOL
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XVOL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.83% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 83 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | +1.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +20.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +9.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | +4.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 16.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -25.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Acruence Capital, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Apr 21, 2021 |
VOO vs XVOL Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF (XVOL) is a ETF from Acruence Capital, LLC. Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% while XVOL returned +20.04%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.48% versus a gain of 1.47% for XVOL.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.80% per year against +9.96% for XVOL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.36% and +4.79% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XVOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -25.8% for XVOL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XVOL charges 0.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $83 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 2.00% for XVOL.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XVOL share 77 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XVOL?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XVOL charges 0.83%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XVOL?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% vs +20.04% for XVOL, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VOO annualized +13.61% vs +4.79% for XVOL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XVOL?
XVOL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XVOL -25.8%.
Should I hold both VOO and XVOL?
VOO and XVOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XVOL?
VOO and XVOL share 77 common holdings with a 23.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XVOL?
VOO yields 1.09% while XVOL yields 2.00%, so XVOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.