VOO vs YLDE
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YLDE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.48% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $173M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 6.39% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 58 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +10.81% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | +16.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | +17.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | +10.94% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -33.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | May 22, 2017 |
VOO vs YLDE Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF (YLDE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while YLDE returned +16.13%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a gain of 10.81% for YLDE.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.06% per year against +17.10% for YLDE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +10.94% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YLDE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -33.3% for YLDE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YLDE charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $48 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 6.39% for YLDE.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and YLDE share 40 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YLDE?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YLDE charges 0.48%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or YLDE?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs +16.13% for YLDE, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs +11.63% for YLDE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or YLDE?
YLDE has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs YLDE -33.3%.
Should I hold both VOO and YLDE?
VOO and YLDE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YLDE?
VOO and YLDE share 40 common holdings with a 23.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YLDE?
VOO yields 1.08% while YLDE yields 6.39%, so YLDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.