VOO vs YNOT
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
Which is better, VOO or YNOT?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, YNOT over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YNOT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $192M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 509 | 105 |
| YTD Return | +11.01% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.60%Best | +14.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.82% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 24.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -17.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,222 | $12,781Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6%Best | 39.2% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Horizon Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jul 9, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.2 years).
VOO vs YNOT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
VOO vs YNOT Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) is an ETF from Horizon Funds. Over the past year VOO returned +15.60% while YNOT returned +14.08%. Year to date, VOO is up 11.01% versus a gain of 12.37% for YNOT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YNOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 12.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for VOO and -17.3% for YNOT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YNOT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.00% for YNOT.
Holdings Overlap
33.0% of VOO's money is in holdings YNOT also owns. 66.6% of YNOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
60 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 106 in YNOT, against full books of 509 and 105.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for YNOT that do not appear in our book for VOO (24.9% of the fund), and 427 for VOO that do not appear in YNOT (66.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in YNOT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.55% | 6.53% | 1.02% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.13% | 2.73% | 1.40% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.62% | 3.64% | 1.02% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.36% | 4.03% | 2.67% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.86% | 1.82% | 1.04% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.21% | 3.42% | 2.21% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.28% | 2.71% | 2.43% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.36% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.58% | 1.70% | 1.12% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.63% | 1.64% | 1.01% |
66.6% of YNOT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YNOT?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YNOT charges 0.75%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or YNOT?
Over the past year VOO returned +15.60% vs +14.08% for YNOT, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VOO annualized +18.20% vs +22.69% for YNOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOO or YNOT?
YNOT has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 12.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -8.9% vs YNOT -17.3%.
Should I hold both VOO and YNOT?
VOO and YNOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YNOT?
66.6% of YNOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 66.6% of YNOT's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 106 in YNOT.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YNOT?
VOO yields 1.04% while YNOT yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is YNOT better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, YNOT over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.