VTI vs VTV
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Which is better, VTI or VTV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTV is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Tie | 0.03%Tie |
| AUM | $690.1B | $192.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 311 |
| YTD Return | +13.35% | +14.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.92% | +18.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.41%Best | +19.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.83%Best | +12.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6%Best | -61.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,286Best | $17,932 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3% | 22.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jan 26, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2004 to Oct 2, 2026 (22.7 years).
VTI vs VTV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.7 years both funds cover.
VTI vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% while VTV returned +18.84%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.35% versus a gain of 14.37% for VTV.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +23.41% per year against +19.73% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.83% and +12.39% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.29% annualized vs +7.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 1.82% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
38.5% of VTI's money is in holdings VTV also owns. 97.7% of VTV's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of VTV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
296 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 299 in VTV, against full books of 3,524 and 311.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for VTV that do not appear in our book for VTI (0.0% of the fund), and 860 for VTI that do not appear in VTV (59.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in VTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.31% | 3.50% | 2.19% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.29% | 3.45% | 2.16% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.28% | 2.99% | 1.71% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.89% | 2.39% | 1.50% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.86% | 2.29% | 1.43% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.68% | 1.81% | 1.13% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.61% | 1.65% | 1.04% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.57% | 1.53% | 0.96% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.55% | 1.47% | 0.92% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.52% | 1.40% | 0.88% |
97.7% of VTV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or VTV?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTV charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, VTI or VTV?
Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% vs +18.84% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VTI annualized +9.29% vs +7.40% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or VTV?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and VTV?
VTI and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and VTV?
97.7% of VTV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 97.7% of VTV's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 296 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 299 in VTV.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or VTV?
VTI yields 1.03% while VTV yields 1.82%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTV better than VTI?
VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTV is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.