VUG vs VV
Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, VUG or VV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VUG led over 3Y and the full window, VV over 1Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VV is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VUG | VV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Tie | 0.03%Tie |
| AUM | $219.5B | $52.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 0.99% |
| Holdings | 146 | 437 |
| YTD Return | +9.77% | +12.38%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.34% | +16.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.08%Best | +21.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.00% | +13.10%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.4%Best | -56.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,424 | $18,506Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.6% | 38.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2004 | Jan 27, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2004 to Sep 18, 2026 (22.6 years).
VUG vs VV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.6 years both funds cover.
VUG vs VV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (VUG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF (VV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VUG returned +12.34% while VV returned +16.34%. Year to date, VUG is up 9.77% versus a gain of 12.38% for VV.
Over three years, VUG compounded at +24.08% per year against +21.61% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.00% and +13.10% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VUG has the edge at +11.21% annualized vs +9.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.8% for VV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.4% for VUG and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VUG charges 0.03% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VUG currently yields 0.38% against 0.99% for VV.
Holdings Overlap
99.7% of VUG's money is in holdings VV also owns. 59.4% of VV's money is in holdings VUG also owns.
Most of VUG is already inside VV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
145 positions in common, counted across the 147 positions we hold weights for in VUG and 431 in VV, against full books of 146 and 437.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 278 positions for VV that do not appear in our book for VUG (39.9% of the fund), and 2 for VUG that do not appear in VV (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VUG | Weight in VV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 12.81% | 7.31% | 5.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 12.59% | 7.18% | 5.41% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.59% | 5.47% | 4.12% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.15% | 4.16% | 0.99% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.80% | 3.31% | 2.49% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.46% | 2.92% | 1.54% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.62% | 2.64% | 1.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.41% | 1.94% | 1.47% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.72% | 1.54% | 1.18% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.44% | 1.39% | 1.05% |
99.7% of VUG is already inside VV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VUG or VV?
VUG has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VV charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, VUG or VV?
Over the past year VUG returned +12.34% vs +16.34% for VV, so VV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VUG annualized +11.21% vs +9.42% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VUG or VV?
VUG has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.8% for VV. Worst drawdown: VUG -51.4% vs VV -56.0%.
Should I hold both VUG and VV?
VUG and VV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VUG and VV?
99.7% of VUG's money is in holdings VV also owns. 59.4% of VV's is in holdings VUG also owns. They hold 145 positions in common, counted across the 147 positions we hold weights for in VUG and 431 in VV.
Which pays a higher dividend, VUG or VV?
VUG yields 0.38% while VV yields 0.99%, so VV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VV better than VUG?
VUG led over 3Y and the full window, VV over 1Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VV is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.