ACGO vs IVV
Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACGO or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 73 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.98% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.61% |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.0% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACGO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACGO vs IVV Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture Growth ETF (ACGO) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACGO is down 0.98% versus a gain of 12.98% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGO charges 0.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
91.8% of ACGO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 50.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ACGO also owns.
Most of ACGO is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
54 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in ACGO and 490 in IVV, against full books of 73 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 429 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACGO (48.1% of the fund), and 11 for ACGO that do not appear in IVV (6.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.72% | 8.07% | 5.65% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.34% | 7.02% | 0.32% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 9.18% | 2.39% | 6.79% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.43% | 5.69% | 0.26% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.84% | 2.65% | 2.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.77% | 3.84% | 1.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.18% | 3.00% | 0.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.01% | 1.90% | 1.11% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.33% | 1.38% | 1.95% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.05% | 1.63% | 1.42% |
91.8% of ACGO is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGO or IVV?
ACGO has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGO and IVV?
91.8% of ACGO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 50.7% of IVV's is in holdings ACGO also owns. They hold 54 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in ACGO and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGO or IVV?
ACGO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACGO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.