ACGR vs TCHP
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, ACGR or TCHP?
Nearly the same fund. ACGR costs less.
ACGR has a lower expense ratio. ACGR led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, TCHP over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACGR is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $11M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 94 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +7.66%Best | +2.74% |
| 1Y Return | +9.05%Best | +5.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.56% | +21.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.15%Best | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5%Best | -42.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,965Best | $15,514 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ACGR vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ACGR vs TCHP Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is an ETF from American Century Investments and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% while TCHP returned +5.10%. Year to date, ACGR is up 7.66% versus a gain of 2.74% for TCHP.
Over three years, ACGR compounded at +19.56% per year against +21.81% for TCHP; over five years the annualized figures are +11.15% and +9.18% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 19.2% for ACGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for ACGR and -42.3% for TCHP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $57 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.10% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
67.5% of ACGR's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 74.9% of TCHP's money is in holdings ACGR also owns.
Most of TCHP is already inside ACGR. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
29 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 62 in TCHP, against full books of 94 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for ACGR (23.5% of the fund), and 60 for ACGR that do not appear in TCHP (30.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGR | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.38% | 17.43% | 4.05% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.90% | 5.50% | 6.40% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.72% | 5.79% | 0.07% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 5.92% | 1.02% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.61% | 4.94% | 1.33% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.97% | 3.05% | 0.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.00% | 3.60% | 1.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.04% | 3.53% | 1.49% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.14% | 1.99% | 1.15% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.46% | 2.26% | 0.20% |
74.9% of TCHP is already inside ACGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or TCHP?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while TCHP charges 0.57%. ACGR is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACGR or TCHP?
Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% vs +5.10% for TCHP, so ACGR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACGR or TCHP?
TCHP has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 19.2% for ACGR. Worst drawdown: ACGR -34.5% vs TCHP -42.3%.
Should I hold both ACGR and TCHP?
ACGR and TCHP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and TCHP?
74.9% of TCHP's money is in holdings ACGR also owns. 74.9% of TCHP's is in holdings ACGR also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 62 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or TCHP?
ACGR yields 0.10% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so ACGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than ACGR?
ACGR has a lower expense ratio. ACGR led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, TCHP over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACGR is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.